by Patrick Zier | Jul 18, 2025 |
There were, quite honestly, questions about whether Chase Briscoe could cut it. He was making the jump from Stewart-Haas to Joe Gibbs Racing, one of the two premier Cup teams in NASCAR, and for Briscoe, it wasn’t really a jump. It was a giant leap.
Not that Briscoe lacked talent. In 2021, he dominated NASCAR’s Xfinity Series, a stepping stone to Cup, with nine wins, most ever by a Ford driver and second only to Sam Ard’s 10 victories in 1983, the modern record. So he could drive.
But Briscoe hit Stewart-Haas in 2022 while he was on the way up and they were on the way down; he was a bright young star driving for a burned out team.
Stewart-Haas became a rudderless ship, drifting aimlessly in the NASCAR Cup Series until it finally hit a rocky shoal where if floundered and sank in 2024.
Briscoe, though, managed to stay afloat. He won two races over the three-year period he was at Stewart-Haas including Darlington’s iconic Southern 500 in 2024, the last race a Stewart-Haas car would ever win.
Then, with everybody at Stewart-Haas scrambling and looking for ways to save their careers, Briscoe caught a break. Martin Truex, one of the stabilizing forces on Gibbs’ team, retired after the 2024 season and Gibbs needed somebody to replace him.
Gibbs, a former Super Bowl-winning coach with the now Washington Commanders, then the Redskins, has always believed that how a person fits into a group is just as important as what he brings to it.
And he passed on some more experienced, more seasoned candidates in favor of Briscoe because he liked the way Briscoe fit, the way he approached racing and what he brought to the table in that regard.
“If you look at Chase, if you look at his background, he’s paid a huge price to be able to get here,” Gibbs said as reported by NASCAR.com. “If you look at the years he spent sleeping on people’s couches and everything it shows you again what a hard climb it is to get to the Cup level. He just deserves so much credit,” Gibbs commented.
Still, this would not be an easy transition, as Briscoe quickly found out. “It’s unlike anything I’ve ever gone through in my career,” Briscoe said on NASCAR.com after securing his first win for JGR at Pocono. “The only similarity, I would say, is being teammates with Kevin Harvick (at Stewart-Haas).
“But even when I was there, Kevin wasn’t really winning either,” Briscoe continued. “The expectation was always there with Kevin but it wasn’t necessarily guys winning week in and week out.
“At Stewart-Haas, it honestly felt like you shocked the world when you won,” Briscoe said. “Here, it doesn’t feel like that because they win a lot. It’s definitely been an adjustment for me. Even just racing with teammates that are winning has been an adjustment for me. It’s definitely been a big learning curve.
“It’s crazy now looking back on it, what I was racing against every single weekend,” Briscoe continued. “It’s mind-blowing how the cars drive, the preparation leading into the week. Nothing against SHR, but now, being inside the walls of JGR, it’s mind-blowing the level they compete at.”
Briscoe noticed the difference between Stewart-Haas and JGR in the first race of the year, The Clash, at Winston-Salem, N.C. “When we went to Bowman Gray (the track in Winston-Salem) I ran the first five laps of practice and I’m like ‘Holy smokes, this is unlike anything I’ve ever driven before,'” Briscoe said.
“It took me a long time, longer than I would have liked, I would say up until Charlotte qualifying I was always underdriving the car,” Briscoe commented. “I am so used to having to lift in certain spots because the car couldn’t take it.
“But the last month (after the Charlotte race) I feel like I finally have been getting used to what this car is capable of, how hard I can push it,” Briscoe said.
“It feels normal now, where at the beginning of the year it felt so foreign, how far I was able to drive it into the corner, how hard I could pick up the gas. Everything was the opposite of what I’ve been used to,” Briscoe added.
“From where he came from, there wasn’t much accountability,” James Small, Briscoe’s crew chief, explained. “Nobody was holding his feet to the fire. That’s probably been a big wake-up call for him.”
“I mean I read the internet,” Briscoe said. “People are like ‘Why would you put that guy in the car?’ Even when I won three poles in a row, not winning the race, people are trashing you,” he remarked.
“I knew we were more than capable, I knew myself that I was capable. But you never really know until you do it,” Briscoe declared. “It’s certainly nice to get that monkey off our back.”
Winning at Pocono showed Briscoe can get the job done, but he had already proven that at Stewart-Haas. What he has to understand is that at JGR, it’s assumed you’re going to win. The difference between Stewart-Haas and JGR is that it’s expected you’ll do it more than once.
NASCAR NOTES
Three most likely winners at Dover: 1-Denny Hamlin, 2-Chase Briscoe, 3-Kyle Larson. Last year’s winner at Dover: Hamlin. Top five at Dover last year: 1-Hamlin, 2-Larson, 3-Martin Truex, 4-Kyle Busch, 5-Chase Elliott.
Last week’s Old Guy Sport Sonoma picks: 1-Shane van Gisbergen, 2-Ty Gibbs, 3-Michael McDowell. Sonoma winner: van Gisbergen. OGS season record: 8-7.
OGS competition index top 10: 1-Hamlin 384 points, 2-Larson 302, 3-Christopher Bell 279, 4-William Byron 237, 5-van Gisbergen 224, 6-Briscoe 215, 7-Ryan Blaney 214, 8-Elliott 122, 9-Gibbs 112, 10-Ross Chastain 104.
OGS competition index top 10 on short tracks (tracks similar to Dover): 1-Hamlin 155, 2-Larson 115, 3-Bell 103, 4-Bubba Wallace 30, Gibbs 30; 6-Elliott 25, 7-Josh Berry 24, 8-Briscoe 20, 9-Blaney 15, 10-Joey Logano 12.
by Patrick Zier | Jul 11, 2025 |
Shane van Gisbergen is currently tearing it up on NASCAR’s street and road courses but, at least right now, he couldn’t win a race on an oval if his racing life depended on it. And it does.
Welcome to the new NASCAR, where a 36-year-old New Zealander who knows next to nothing about running on an oval, the traditional foundation of the sport, can surge to the top of stock car racing by being better at turning left and right than any of his peers.
He is so good, in fact, that some are ready to crown him as NASCAR’s best ever even though he has only run four road races in his very brief NASCAR career (he did, however, win three of them).
Until recently, NASCAR has never been about road racing. And back in the day, it was even kind of looked down on by the drivers who, for the most part, came out of the rural South and engaged in the rough-and-tumble, get-out-of-my-way competition that got everything going.
There was only one road race, at Riverside, Calif, and it led into the Daytona 500 which, at that time, was not the first race of the season. When Riverside closed, in 1988, Sonoma and Watkins Glen were added to the schedule and until recently they were the only two road races NASCAR ran on a regular basis.
This year there are six, including two in a row, Chicago last week and Sonoma this Sunday. And van Gisbergen, who won Chicago, will be a heavy favorite to win at Sonoma. And he will be favored again at Watkins Glen, which is Aug. 10th.
But after that, van Gisbergen’s problems begin. If he wins at Sonoma and the Glen, he could head into the playoffs with four wins, all on road courses, and that does not bode well for his chances at a championship.
The 10-race playoff is an elimination derby, with 16 drivers competing. Three are eliminated after the first three races, three more after races four through six and three more after races seven through nine, leaving four eligible for the championship in the final race at Phoenix.
And nine of those races are on ovals. There is a race on the Charlotte Motor Speedway road course after the first elimination round, but van Gisbergen isn’t going to get that far because he simply isn’t comfortable enough running ovals to compete.
His two best oval finishes this year are a 14th at Charlotte (on the regular track) and an 18th at Michigan, and he wasn’t a factor in either race.
“That’s why I’m here, I guess (to win on road courses),” van Gisbergen said as reported by NASCAR.com after the Chicago race. “Justin (team owner Justin Marks) took a massive chance on me to bring me over (from New Zealand), and as I’ve said many times, these races are like a holiday to me. It’s the ovals where I’m really focused on getting better and better,” van Gisbergen added.
“I think it’s a unique project with Shane,” Marks commented after the race in Chicago, also on NASCAR.com. “I wouldn’t do this – we wouldn’t be doing this if we thought we could go win road courses and we know we’re not going to run that good on ovals because he’s never done it before,” Marks continued. “At this level of the game, you have to be a complete package.
“For his level of intelligence and how he studies and how he adapts and how he learns, there’s a real opportunity here for him to figure the ovals out and get fast at the ovals and be a complete Cup driver,” Marks said.
“I think we’ve seen him coming that way just in the last month and a half. He’s pretty consistently top 20 now on the ovals and when he started running he was kind of like 30th, 32nd and I think that development is just going to continue.
“I think when you think about the project, we’ve got somebody who’s talented and that we can make a Cup driver out of, and while he learns, in the meantime, we can win a ton of road courses and punch that ticket to the playoffs and give our sponsors a ton of return for their investment,” Marks declared.
At 36, van Gisbergen is much older then the normal driver who moves up to Cup, and maybe you can teach an old dog new tricks. Just not this year, though.
NASCAR NOTES
Three most likely winners at Sonoma: 1-Shane van Gisbergen, 2-Ty Gibbs, 3-Michael McDowell. Last year’s winner at Sonoma: Kyle Larson. Top five at Sonoma last year: 1- Larson, 2-McDowell, 3-Chris Buescher, 4-Chase Elliott, 5-Ross Chastain.
Last week’s Old Guy Sport competition index picks: 1-Christopher Bell, 2-van Gisbergen, 3-Elliott. Chicago winner: van Gisbergen. OGS season record: 7-7.
OGS competition index top 10 after 15 races: 1-Denny Hamlin 384 points, 2-Larson 301, 3-Bell 269, 4-William Byron 237, 5-Ryan Blaney 214, 6-Chase Briscoe 175, 7-van Gisbergen 149, 8-Gibbs 112, 9-Chastain 102, 10-Tyler Reddick 98.
OGS competition index top 10 on road courses (tracks similar to Sonoma): 1-van Gisbergen 149 points, 2-Bell 95, 3-Reddick 65, 4-Gibbs 51, 5-Elliott 50, 6-Byron 40, 7-Kyle Busch 38, 8-McDowell 27, 9-Hamlin 20, Alex Bowman 20.
by Patrick Zier | Jul 4, 2025 |
It was not a race, it was a demolition derby. It’s what usually happens when you take NASCAR’s three superspeedways – Daytona, Talladega and more recently Atlanta – bunch everybody up and put drivers in cars that have no ability to pass because of rigid rules that don’t allow teams to make any modifications to the equipment.
What you end up with is a parade, with everybody running nose-to-tail until somebody makes a mistake. Then what you get is the big one, the big wreck, cars spinning crazily out of control, banging into each other until there is little left but mangled metal and smoking engines.
It happened again last week in Atlanta, when Denny Hamlin bumped into John Hunter Nemechek on lap 69 of the Quaker State 400, sending Nemechek into somebody else who hit somebody else who was trying to brake to avoid getting caught up in the mess that eventually collected 23 cars. Race over for those guys.
NASCAR Cup drivers have come to expect this. They don’t know where it will happen or when it will happen, they just know it’s likely to happen. And they know there’s nothing they can do about it.
And they have become immune to it. There is no more anger, no more frustration. This is what NASCAR has allowed superspeedway racing to become, so drivers go in expecting to wreck and hoping, somehow, to avoid the mishaps and simply finish the race. That, in itself, represents victory.
Denny Hamlin, as quoted by NBC sports: “I was on Nemechek’s bumper and he was on the bumper of somebody else. Some zigged, some zagged, most crashed,” he stated matter-of-factly. Hamlin would finish 31st.
Joey Logano, equally as nonchalant: “Cars are sideways and you get on the brakes and everyone is just running into each other,” he said resignedly. It’s just a superspeedway wreck.” Logano would finish 36th.
William Byron: “They all stacked up and at that point, I went right a little bit. The wreck was already happening and I just kind of got shoved into it.” Byron would finish 37th.
For its part, NASCAR has seemed to get a little bit complacent about what’s happening on it’s superspeedways. The sport has made tremendous strides in safety since the death of Dale Earnhardt and officials have been watching these cars wreck and everybody walk away since then.
They are trying to build a new base of younger fans who have short attention spans and like excitement, and the big wrecks are exciting, so why not give them what they want?
Of course you have to wonder if this younger generation is made up of real fans. Real fans don’t want to see their favorite driver eliminated from contention, through no fault of his own, by the big wreck.
This was hammered home after the Atlanta wreck fest. NASCAR, which has been pushing more and more gimmicks to attract viewers, has a million dollar playoff going in which drivers are seeded and paired against each other over a five week period with the eventual winner taking home the cash.
Hamlin, the No. 1 seed, was up against Ty Dillon, seeded 32nd and last, at Atlanta. Because Hamlin wrecked, Dillon moves on to the next round at Chicago this weekend and Hamlin is out.
Corresponding to the playoff for the drivers, NASCAR also has one for fans, who howled with disapproval when drivers like Hamlin, Logano and Byron were knocked out in the first round.
This simply drives home how ridiculous any kind of a playoff system, whether it’s the million dollar challenge or the Cup championship playoffs, is in racing.
It doesn’t work in NASCAR because you don’t get a second chance. An NFL quarterback can throw a couple interceptions in the first quarter and then come back and throw the winning touchdown pass in the fourth.
But on NASCAR superspeedways you can do everything right, have the best car, and still get eliminated because of somebody else’s mistake. There is no second chance.
Hopefully, somebody at NASCAR will realize that, scrap all the playoffs and make the necessary changes that will allow cars to gain separation and pass by themselves on superspeedways. Then maybe we can see real racing again.
NASCAR NOTES
Three most likely winners at Chicago: 1-Christopher Bell, 2-Shane van Gisbergen, 3-Chase Elliott. Last year’s winner at Chicago: Alex Bowman. Top five in last year’s race: 1-Bowman, 2-Tyler Reddick, 3-Ty Gibbs, 4-Joey Hand, 5-Michael McDowell.
Last week’s Old Guy Sport picks: None. Superspeedway races (Atlanta, Daytona, Talladega) do not count in the Old Guy Sport competition index.
Old Guy Sport competition index top 10 after 14 races: 1-Denny Hamlin 364 points, 2-Kyle Larson 301, 3-Bell 269, 4-William Byron 237, 5-Ryan Blaney 211, 6-Chase Briscoe 168, 7-Ross Chastain 102, 8-Bubba Wallace 93, 9-Elliott 92, 10-Joey Logano 91.
Old Guy Sport competition index top 10 on road courses (tracks similar to Chicago); 1-Bell 95, 2-van Gisbergen 86, 3-Elliott 50, 4-Byron 40, 5-Reddick 35, 6-Kyle Busch 28, 7-Bowman 20, 8-Gibbs 11, 9-McDowell 10, 10-Ryan Preece 4.
